Laughter: Society’s Most Influential Tool


Think about things that make you laugh. Jokes? Comedies? Cat videos? Other people laughing? What about funny looking people, cultural traditions you’re not familiar with, or someone getting bullied? I’m assuming that the majority of you would openly admit that the first four subjects often induce laughter, but most individuals will have a difficult time admitting to laughing at the three last subjects. However, though laughter tends to be associated with positive emotions, its function extends beyond recognizing hilarity. In fact, laughter has served as an extremely influential, cross-cultural social mechanism throughout history, and its prompting is not always good-natured. By compiling research in psychology, sociology, and history, Guardian columnist Robert Provine has addressed the power of laughter in societies across the world, exploring the concept that “laughter is more about relationships than humour” [1].

First of all, it’s important to realize that laughter is contagious, or as I like to think of it, socially transmittable. Since we as humans are social creatures, we are susceptible to the emotions of other humans, and laughter is a particularly emotive gesture. Laughter is essentially a vocalization of a strong emotion–be it happiness, surprise, or malevolence–that is meant to be shared with other people. This emotional vocalization, however, is capable of losing its socially purposeful bearing, and can become borderline pathological in rare cases involving masses of people laughing uncontrollably. Provine recounts the laughter epidemic in Tanzania in 1962:

What began as an isolated fit of laughter in a group of 12-to 18-year-old schoolgirls rapidly rose to epidemic proportions. Contagious laughter propagated from one individual to the next, eventually infecting adjacent communities. Like an influenza outbreak, the laughter epidemic was so severe that it required the closing of at least 14 schools and afflicted about 1,000 people. Fluctuating in intensity, it lasted for around two and a half years. A psychogenic, hysterical origin of the epidemic was established after excluding alternatives such as toxic reaction and encephalitis [1].
 

The “psychogenic and hysterical origin” of this laughter epidemic implies that the epidemic arose from social psychology and neurobiology gone wrong. The commonplace psychological mechanism of laughter has such a strong social influence that it can spread like wildfire when socially transmitted in a conducive environment. But why does laughter have so much power over our psyches? According to the psychologist Dr. Greg Markway, “Laughing releases serotonin, increases T cells, increases endorphins and improves the immune system” [2]. This goes to say that laughter is biologically rewarding: it releases chemicals that make us feel good, and it helps prevent disease. By evaluating the content of Provine’s account of laughter and considering the biological processes that underlie giggling, I hypothesize that serotonin (a neurochemical responsible for mood, emotional regulation and numerous physiological functions, among other roles) plays a significant role in the contagion of laughter–from a conversation between a few people to country-wide laughing epidemics–because it helps us experience positive emotions in social settings. Too much of a good thing, however, isn’t always good: it’s possible to have too much serotonin [3], and this just might provide a further explanation for the widespread hysteria of laughing epidemics.

Serotonin

Now that we’ve clarified the neurobiological underpinnings of laughter’s influential nature, we can address some ways in which humans use laughter to manipulate social situations. Provine comments on the human reaction to canned laughter on TV sitcoms, and how hearing other people laugh can make us chuckle:

Psychology researchers jumped on the new phenomenon of “canned” laughter, confirming that laugh tracks do indeed increase audience laughter and the audience’s rating of the humorousness of the comedy material, attributing the effect to sometimes baroque mechanisms (deindividuation; release restraint mediated by imitation; social facilitation; emergence of social norms, etc). Decades later, we learned that the naked sound of laughter itself can evoke laughter – that you don’t need a joke [1].
 

Television programs have successfully monopolized this psychological strategy of inducing laughter with laughter. Since laughing puts people in better moods, they’ll be more likely to associate positive feelings with TV shows that strategically and systematically feature canned laughter.

While canned laughter is pretty much inconsequential, other forms of laughter can be socially manipulated to promulgate cruelty. Provine makes the point that laughter is a very powerful social cue, and isn’t always used in a positive manner.

If you think laughter is benign, be aware that laughter is present during the worst atrocities, from murder, rape and pillage in antiquity to the present. Laughter has been present at the entertainments of public executions and torture. On street corners around the world, laughing at the wrong person or at the wrong time can get you killed…The killers at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, were laughing as they strolled through classrooms murdering their classmates. Laughter accompanies ethnic violence and insult, from Kosovo to Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
 

The subjects from the quote above are obviously not jokes, yet people have still made them laughing matters. Though it’s highly unlikely that any of you readers have personally laughed while murdering someone, many people are still guilty for laughing at things that really aren’t funny, like making fun of someone’s culture, snickering to encourage bullying, or guffawing at a fight in a high school hallway. So why do we laugh at things in an act of cruelty the same way we laugh at things we find humorous? To address this conundrum, it’s important to make the distinction that laughing at someone is very different from laughing with someone. Laughing with another person can affirm a positive relationship, but laughing at someone conveys a harsh social message, such as exclusion. According to Provine,

Laughter is a rich source of information about complex social relationships, if you know where to look. Learning to “read” laughter is particularly valuable because laughter is involuntary and hard to fake, providing an uncensored, honest account about what people really think about each other, and you.
 

If a group of people is laughing at you rather than with you, there’s a strong possibility that they don’t think too highly of you. This can be very upsetting, as humans prefer social approval to social rejection.

On a lighter note, laughter’s association with humor hasn’t been forgotten. People on dating websites still want a partner with “a good sense of humor” and “a nice laugh.” This suggests that laughter is valuable, and might add another element of connection to an intimate relationship. According to Provine,

Laughter and humour are highly valued in the sexual marketplace. In 3,745 personal ads published by heterosexual males and females in eight US national newspapers on 28 April 1996, men offered “sense of humour” (or “humorous”) and women requested it. Women couldn’t care less whether their ideal male partner laughs or not – they want a male who makes them laugh. Women sought humour more than twice as often as they offered it.
 

Overall, laughter clearly has a stronghold over societies, historically and cross-culturally. It always seems to convey a strong emotion or a social message, and usually receives a reaction. Laughter is its own interpersonal language, and is often revealing of social truths.


Attribution

[1] Beyond a joke: the truth about why we laugh, The Guardian
[2] Experts say laughter really is a good medicine, Natural News
[3] Serotonin, Psychiatrist

Image via
LA Wilshire Periodontics
You and Me Magazine
Flickr


Commentary Ticker

  • Google Glass Lets You Take Photos With Your Brain
    July 12, 2014 | 4:02 pm

    If you haven’t heard, electroencephalograms (EEGs) have been getting better. Way better. Artificial limbs and even video game controllers are utilizing the non-invasive brain-wave monitoring method to guide computers by thought. Now English startup This Place has developed a way to bring the technology to Google Glass, allowing Google’s wearable to read your mind. Well, […]

  • Android Art: The Accidental Selfies of Google Art Project
    July 5, 2014 | 11:11 am

    Within the cultural centers of the world lurks a mechanical beast draped in silver spinning madly and capturing everything, sometimes even itself. In 2011 Google created the Art Project, an initiative to bring their Street View technology inside the cultural epicenters of the world. Google enlisted 17 world-class museums in short time. Institutions such as […]

  • Purple Mountunes Majesty: The Most Patriotic Playlist
    July 4, 2014 | 12:13 pm

    A while ago, Paul Lamere of The Echo Nest, a music-analysis company, took to finding each state’s most distinctive, yet popular, artist in a viral article. Spotify took note, purchasing Echo Nest for their analytical talent. Together, they’ve released a blog post documenting each state’s most distinctively American song creating a patriotic playlist for the […]

  • Emojinealogy: Where the Heck Emojis Come From
    July 2, 2014 | 3:10 pm

    On June 16th, the Unicode Consortium announced that 250 new emoji would be added to the list of symbols available to people’s cellphones and computer devices. The list of the new symbols can be found on Emojipedia. And no, the list doesn’t include the much needed minority representation, but it does include your favorite (?) […]

  • The Decline and Fall of the American Mall
    June 24, 2014 | 9:07 pm

    For ages, the shopping mall was as essential to the architecture of suburbia as Levittowns and freeways. But in an era of online shopping, these epicenters of brick and mortar yesteryear are quietly being abandoned across the country. While the U.S. currently has around 1,500, the number may soon shrink, and rapidly, leading to abandoned […]

  • RSSArchive for Commentary Ticker »

Join our mailing list!



Trending on The Airspace